Monday, May 12, 2014

FFS #2: Oscar Winners for Best Picture and Best Director




I decided to watch films that received an Academy Award for both Best Director and Best Picture-arguably the two most prestigious awards. Although this has happened with quite a few films, I chose to watch these three because they were all so diverse and I wanted to find a commonality that the Academy may be looking for in award winners.

Annie Hall was directed by Woody Allen and released in 1977. One of his more famous films, this seemed to break all sort of rules in filmmaking. Allen's character repeatedly broke the fourth wall and talked to the camera-something that was rare before this film. Out of all of these films, I think this one had the best script and personality to it. Through Allen's directing and acting it was apparent that he put a lot of time and energy into the script which he co-wrote and the delivery of the lines. Rarely have I seen a romantic comedy that I found so original and engaging and not as cliche and boring. The Academy clearly noticed this because they also gave Annie Hall an award for Best Original Screenplay.

The next film I watched was American Beauty, a 1999 film directed by Sam Mendes. Among Best Picture and Best Director, the film also won Best Original Screenplay, Best Cinematography, and Best Actor (Kevin Spacey). First off, if you have not seen this film, then I highly recommend it. Although the plot is hard to explain, this is probably one of the most real films I have seen. Spacey well deserved his award and the film was beautifully directed and presented. I could have probably watched this with the sound off and have been just as stunned as I was by the story because the shots were perfected done to every detail and adds to the mood of the entire movie. The editing was typical but it didn't need to be anything special because of everything else the movie had to offer. When put in the context of it being made in 1999, the fact that it won Best Picture is understandable because of the message the film gives out, which tends to be what the Academy loves.

Lastly, I watched The Departed which was directed by Martin Scorsese and released in 2006. I chose this film because I had known there was a lot of controversy surrounding the awards it won and I wanted to see for myself whether or not it actually deserved it. This film also won Best Adapted Screenplay and Best Film Editing. Out of all the awards it received, I have to say that the editing award was very well deserved. It was edited in such a fast pace way that keeps you interested that you almost forget the film is 2 and a half hours long. One specific sequence that really interested me (I watched it about six times) was when there were short scene cuts back and forth between Damon and DiCaprio's characters. There were many moments like that because their characters are so connected but only appear in about three scenes together. If the editing had not been done to connect them so fluidly and effectively, then it would have felt awkward when they finally meet in the climax of the movie.

Personally, I loved this film and would probably put it in my top 10, but I am kind of conflicted over whether or not it deserved Best Picture. I didn't quite get the feelings I got when I watched Annie Hall or American Beauty. So, I looked up what all the controversy was about and discovered that many put The Departed on lists of "Worst Best Picture Winners Ever." According to Peter Eramo, Jr. of Listverse, who ranked it #6 on his personal list, said "I love Martin Scorsese and am a huge fan of so many of his films, but this had no business winning the top two awards of the night, let alone the honor of being nominated. If any film actually stood out that year, Scorsese would have gone home empty-handed once again. But, alas, no film existed."

Seeing this article really made me wonder what the difference is between a great film and a "Best Picture." It seems that there is no clear cut answer and that it is different for everyone. Although I enjoyed The Departed probably the most, that was only because I love thriller movies and it was catered towards my taste. That doesn't mean that it is more deserving than Annie Hall, which I liked but could probably not watch again and again. So, who decides? It seemed that the connection between all three of these movies was that they were loved by many and they made an impact during that specific year. So, therefore, the winner can depend on that year and what other movies were out and what political/social issues we are facing at that time. The Academy Awards seem to be a tricky thing to try to figure out. Regardless, all of these movies and many other winners are, in my opinion, deserving for one reason or another. Whether or not everyone necessarily agrees.

Article: http://listverse.com/2010/05/12/top-10-worst-best-picture-winners/ 

1 comment:

  1. Great work here, and a very interesting focus. I've seen all of these films and really liked them all, so I guess I'm a big biased--but, I really enjoyed reading your post. You hit a lot of strong points with all three of these films. And yes, towards the end you explore some ideas about what makes for an award-winning film. It's hard to say. But I guess the academy seems to lean toward serious films (which is odd with Annie Hall) and sharp-looking popular films with some art and style, but not too much. It might have been even more interesting to hear to speak about the director/best picture winner going TOGETHER--like is there anything to say about these films that's different from typical best picture winners? When the director wins and the movie wins, does that make it better somehow? Anyway, nice work.

    ReplyDelete